Skip to content
EdgeLex

AI & Intelligence · Projects + Drafting

One case, fully organized for AI — and a work product engine that turns the record into Review Tables, Discovery Matrices, chronologies and formal drafts, every cell traceable to its exact source.

Included with EdgeLex

Project — Civil · Hale v. Northstar Logistics

📁 Civil — Hale v. Northstar

Project chats use the instructions, files, and saved AI work attached here.

Living project work products

📇 Matter Source Inventory CURRENT

Built Aug 14 · 419 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 419 source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🧮 Discovery Matrix FRESH

Built Aug 14 · 19 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 19 current source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🗺 Matter Evidence Map SCOPE NEEDED

Tests lawyer-defined propositions against the exact current Source Inventory.

Current inventory ready · lawyer proposition required

Define scope

🕰 Case Chronology NOT BUILT

What happened at each stage: filings, responses, hearing outcomes, next expected hearings.

Build nowCustomize

⚠ Issue Register NOT BUILT

Issues, evidence, adverse facts, missing proof, risk, and next action.

Build nowCustomize

+ Describe any work product GOVERNED

Create a governed living Project artifact from a sentence.

🧭 Instructions — “You are my dedicated Civil Law Legal AI Agent for Hale v. Northstar, an Alameda County civil matter, Case No. 26CV004182. Your role is litigation strategy, procedural analysis, hearing preparation…”
📎 Files — 28 files across 15 project sections, mirroring the Matter’s Documents tab · 28 Lex-ready · Pleadings 5 · Discovery 19 · Motions and Briefs 1 · …

The problem

AI is only as good as the context it holds — and most tools make the lawyer rebuild that context in every conversation, with no way to know whether yesterday's analysis still matches today's record.

One case, engineered for AI · the work product engine

Created. Organized. Chosen. Reviewed. Matrixed. Preflighted. Delivered.

Follow one Project from a memory policy through a Review Table and a Discovery Matrix to a deliverable in the record — every screen below is the real product, with the numbers from real runs.

01 · Created

A Project starts with a memory policy.

Bind a Project to a matter and its folders mirror the matter's own taxonomy. Then decide — with checkboxes, not defaults — what Lex may remember and must confirm: matter memory, document memory, related-matter context, personalization.

Create New Project — files, chats, instructions, and memory policy

Use projects to organize files, chats, instructions, and memory policy for ongoing work.

Project nameCivil — Hale v. Northstar
MatterHarborview HOA · Hale v. Northstar ▾

When a matter is selected, project file folders mirror that matter’s Documents tab.

Project objectivePrepare dispositive motion strategy, organize key evidence, and keep issue-first analysis.

Memory policy

☑ Use global personalization

☑ Use active matter memory

☑ Use selected document memory

☐ Allow related matter context

☑ Confirm matter facts

☑ Confirm case events

CancelCreate Project

02 · Organized & built

The case brain, with receipts.

Instructions, files, and saved AI work in one governed context — and living work products that prove their own state: FRESH with a recorded build receipt and every source fingerprint verified, SCOPE NEEDED when a lawyer proposition is missing, NOT BUILT when nothing pretends otherwise. Describe any work product in a sentence and it becomes a governed living artifact.

How new authority arrives →
Project — Civil · Hale v. Northstar Logistics

📁 Civil — Hale v. Northstar

Project chats use the instructions, files, and saved AI work attached here.

Living project work products

📇 Matter Source Inventory CURRENT

Built Aug 14 · 419 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 419 source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🧮 Discovery Matrix FRESH

Built Aug 14 · 19 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 19 current source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🗺 Matter Evidence Map SCOPE NEEDED

Tests lawyer-defined propositions against the exact current Source Inventory.

Current inventory ready · lawyer proposition required

Define scope

🕰 Case Chronology NOT BUILT

What happened at each stage: filings, responses, hearing outcomes, next expected hearings.

Build nowCustomize

⚠ Issue Register NOT BUILT

Issues, evidence, adverse facts, missing proof, risk, and next action.

Build nowCustomize

+ Describe any work product GOVERNED

Create a governed living Project artifact from a sentence.

🧭 Instructions — “You are my dedicated Civil Law Legal AI Agent for Hale v. Northstar, an Alameda County civil matter, Case No. 26CV004182. Your role is litigation strategy, procedural analysis, hearing preparation…”
📎 Files — 28 files across 15 project sections, mirroring the Matter’s Documents tab · 28 Lex-ready · Pleadings 5 · Discovery 19 · Motions and Briefs 1 · …

03 · Chosen

Describe the work product, or pick one the firm already trusts.

Review Table, Discovery Matrix, Case Status Summary, Matter Source Inventory, Matter Evidence Map, Issue Register, Case Chronology, or a custom work product in a sentence — and the formal drafts: brief or motion, a single cited section, an amendment in your precedent's conventions. Each one starts from the exact approved Project sources, never from a blank prompt.

New work product — What should Lex produce?

What should Lex produce?

Practice area · General / Other ▾

Custom Work Product

A custom source-grounded legal work product defined by the lawyer.

Review Table

Apply typed, evidence-grounded columns across the exact approved Project sources, review each finding, and publish an immutable snapshot.

Case Status Summary

Current operational status, issue-bound evidence, governed case events, gaps, and next actions.

Matter Source Inventory

Audits current Project DMS documents and Matter-linked emails without deciding what they prove.

Matter Evidence Map

Tests lawyer-defined propositions against one exact current Matter Source Inventory.

Issue Register

Issues, evidence, adverse facts, missing proof, risk, and next action.

Case Chronology

Dated event timeline with source support and missing-date flags.

Discovery Matrix

Every request paired to its response and objection, production checks, meet-and-confer, zero model calls.

Formal document drafts

Brief / Motion Draft · facts pinpointed to your record, law standing only on verified authority · Section Draft · one cited section supporting one proposition · Amendment Draft · exactly your stated changes, in your precedent’s conventions

‹ BackNext ›

04 · Reviewed

A Review Table: typed columns, every cell with its receipt.

Choose a governed template and freeze the sources. EdgeLex fills the table across all of them: this run, 31 sources and 10 columns, 310 cells analyzed, 273 evidence passages, 54 verified empty results, one source limitation disclosed in the snapshot rather than hidden. Click any cell and the cited source opens at the page. The review assistant answers only from this run. Publish, and the snapshot is immutable.

TestReview — Review Tables / Definition v2 · 31 sources · 10 columns

Ready to publish with source limitations

1 source limitation affects 1 result. It will be disclosed in the published snapshot; no individual approval is required.

Draft XLSXDraft PDFFinalize & publish

31 documents with results · 24 relevance results · 31 party results · 30 date results · 273 evidence passages · 275 policy-cleared cells · 54 verified empty results

DocumentTypeDateDescription
DefendantsRFP SET THREEdms_document
completed
2026-05-05T23:03
completed
Defendants' Request for Production…
source verified
Set FIVE RequestforAdmissionsdms_document
completed
2026-05-05T23:03
completed
Defendants' Requests for Admissions…
source verified
PLTF IDC STATEMENT 1st RFP And Depodms_document
completed
2026-06-11T11:57
completed
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE…
source verified
DefendantsResponsetoInterrogatory Finaldms_document
completed
2026-05-05T23:08
completed
DEFENDANT'S VERIFIED…
source verified
POS 08-15-2026dms_document
completed
2026-08-19T16:30
completed
Proof of Service by First…
source verified
Exhibit Hdms_document
completed
2026-05-05T23:02
completed
Defendant Dwayne Dav…
source verified
0615 · Minute Order · Abernathy vs Duncandms_document
completed
2026-08-19T15:45
completed
A June 15, 2026 minute…
source verified

Cited source

Exhibit H · EdgeDocs · v1.0

Source workbench
Review Table source · Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

LINDSAY ABERNATHY, Plaintiff · Case No. 24CU027820N

DEFENDANTS’ REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET FOUR

Exact evidence · read deterministically from the frozen source · Mark for follow-up

Review assistant · answers are bound to this exact run; every legal finding must resolve to a table cell and its source evidencecompleted · 310/310 cells analyzed

05 · Matrixed

A Discovery Matrix, with zero model calls.

Every request paired to its response and objection across the matter's discovery: 361 items from 21 sources, 117 unmatched requests and 126 unmatched responses surfaced as exceptions instead of guesses, 90 objection-only items queued for a lawyer, 245 production checks. Each item shows its exact evidence anchor down to the line. The lawyer confirms or corrects the pairing, adds the next action or a meet-and-confer entry, and the decision joins the audit history. Freeze a draft, publish a release, export XLSX, PDF, CSV or HTML.

Deadlines the matrix feeds →
Discovery Matrix — Governed Work Products / English definition v6 · current published Matter Source Inventory · zero model calls

Run and release

Status
completed with exceptions

Sources 21 · Items 361

Exceptions 328 · Open follow-ups 0

Changes since prior build
4 added · 293 changed · 41 removed
Freeze working draftPublish release

Draft XLSX · PDF · CSV · HTML

Discovery command center · whole-matrix counts · 361 total items

0

Missing responses

117

Unmatched requests

126

Unmatched responses

90

Objection-only review

245

Production checks

0

Open actions

0

Meet-and-confer

ItemRequestResponse or objectionPairingIssue for review
ROG 1No matching request found33 Responding Party objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overly broad…Unmatched response · request not foundRequest needed
ROG 132 If your response to Defendant's Request for Admission No. 15 (First Set, served May 17, 2025) denying…—response not matchednot applicable
ROG 133 If your response to Defendant's Request for Admission No. 17 (First Set, served May 17, 2025)…OBJECTIONS: The general objections stated above are incorporated herein by this reference.request response matchedprivilege_or_work_product_objection; scope_or_relevance_objection
ROG 1073 If you deny making the statement referenced in Special Interrogatory No. 9, identify all persons…—response not matchednot applicable

Item and exact source

Defendants_Request_SET_TWO_Interrogatories · EdgeDocs v1.0 · page 2 of 5

Request evidence · 1 evidence anchor

31 SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO
32 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
33 If your response to Defendant’s Request for Admission No. 15 (First Set, served May 17, 2025)…

Lawyer decision and next action

The extracted result stays unchanged. Your decision is added to its audit history.

Confirm pairingCorrect pairingAdd to meet-and-confer

06 · Preflighted

Formal drafting starts by freezing the request.

The preflight records scope, sources, model budget, and fixed tool authority — and creates nothing: no task, no run, no model call, no document. Governance happens before the first token, not after the mistake.

New work product — Review Brief / Motion Draft preflight

Saving freezes this request. It does not start Lex or create a document.

No Task, Goal Run, model call, or DMS document will be created in this preflight step.
Scope and sourcesMatter required · 28/28 Project documents Lex-ready · exact current versions frozen by the backend.
Model and budget policylegal_clean_context_review · legal_evidence_retrieval · legal_synthesis — up to $15.00 and 8 minutes.
Fixed authority7 tools · 0 actions · no external effects.
Expected outputDraft DOCX saved as a normal DMS version, with AI provenance and EdgeDocs review before external use.
Recipe v6 · graph v6Save immutable preflight

07 · Delivered

Deliverables land in the record, not in a chat window.

A finished draft arrives as a normal DMS version with AI provenance — 'Verified deliverable from legal graph' — ready for EdgeDocs or Word review before anything external happens.

The document's life from here →
MSA Obligation Register — Harborview HOA · Version history and document analytics
Search versions…All Versions ▾

🗓 This Month (2 versions) · Group by Date

v0.1Active🔔 1 week ago✎ Open in EdgeDocsOpen in Microsoft Word

Verified deliverable from legal graph msa_obligation_register.v1 — every obligation traced to its clause span.

👤 Maya Chen (Attorney) · 301 words · 10 KB

🔒 Checked out by you17h 43m
MC● Idle↩ Check in⬇ Offline Copy
v0.0🔒 Locked🔔 1 week agoOpen in EdgeDocsOpen in Microsoft Word

Initial version.

👤 Maya Chen (Attorney) · 294 words · 10 KB

🔒 Checkout ▾⬇ Offline Copy

The difference

Context is engineered, not accumulated.

Most AI tools let context pile up until nobody knows what the model is looking at. A Project makes it explicit: these sources, these instructions, this memory policy — and work products that can prove they were built from the current record, not last month’s.

How Lex uses it →

Build receipts

Every living work product records how and when it was built — deterministically.

Source fingerprints

419 sources verified against the current record. Stale is shown, never hidden.

Memory by policy

What Lex remembers and must confirm is a per-Project decision, not a default.

Capabilities

What it does

One governed context per case

A Project binds instructions, files, saved AI work, and memory policy to a matter. Project chats start from the whole case, not a blank box.

Review Tables

Pick a governed template (12 in English: Project Source Review, E-Discovery, Change of Control, Commercial Agreement, Lease, Credit Agreement…), freeze the exact sources, and EdgeLex fills typed, evidence-grounded columns across every document. A real run: 31 sources, 10 columns, 310 cells analyzed, 273 evidence passages, 275 policy-cleared cells, 54 verified empty results, 1 source limitation disclosed rather than hidden. Every cell opens its cited source at the page; a review assistant answers only from this run; drafts export to XLSX and PDF; publishing makes an immutable snapshot.

Discovery Matrix

Every request paired to its response and objection across the matter's discovery, with zero model calls: 361 items from 21 sources in one run, 117 unmatched requests and 126 unmatched responses surfaced as exceptions, 90 objection-only items queued for review, 245 production checks. Each item shows its exact evidence anchor (page and line), the lawyer confirms or corrects the pairing, adds a next action or a meet-and-confer entry, and the decision lands in the audit history. Freeze a working draft, publish a release, export XLSX, PDF, CSV or HTML.

Living work products

Case Status Summary, Matter Source Inventory, Matter Evidence Map, Issue Register, Case Chronology, or a custom work product defined in a sentence — built deterministically, stamped with a build receipt, and verified against current source fingerprints. FRESH means provably fresh; stale is shown, never hidden.

Immutable preflights

Formal drafting starts by freezing the request: scope, sources, model budget, and fixed tool authority — recorded before a single model call. The preflight itself creates nothing and spends nothing.

Deliverables land in the record

A draft arrives as a normal DMS version with AI provenance, ready for EdgeDocs or Word review — never a loose file in a chat window.

Memory under policy

Each Project chooses what Lex may remember and confirm: matter memory, document memory, related-matter context, personalization — checkboxes, not defaults.

In your control

The Project is a governance boundary: its instructions, sources, and memory policy are explicit and inspectable, its work products carry receipts, and nothing it produces enters the record without review.

See EdgeLex on your own terms.

We'll walk through your firm's workflows, where you want it to run, and which AI you want it to use. A real person answers at sales@edgelex.com.