Skip to content
EdgeLex

AI & Intelligence · Lex AI & Agents

The intelligence layer of the firm — Lex follows the work everywhere, and only acts when you say so.

Included with EdgeLex · Available across web, mobile, and desktop

app.edgelex.com — AI ChatMC

Good morning, Maya — you have 8 overdue tasks.

What needs me today?/task
Upcoming court deadlines/deadline
Latest from opposing counsel/email

Type / in the message box to route a turn — filing, deadline, draft, email, billing, and more.

🏛 Court access4 courts · 5 Matters dueCA-4182CA-2077GA-1312✓ 12 case updates · Extension enabledReview ▾
🗂 Hale v. Northstar — Alameda

Ask Lex to research, review, draft, or explain… (type / for commands)

📎🎙/ Commands — /matter /task /cite /send /agent🛡 Firm model · governed

The problem

Cloud legal AI lives in a separate chatbot: it answers from a model you can't see, trained on data you can't audit, disconnected from where the work actually happens. For work that is malpractice-adjacent, that's not good enough.

What working with Lex is like

Asked. Touched. Organized. Everywhere. Delegated. Governed.

From one grounded answer to a standing workforce under firm policy — every screen below is the real product.

01 · Asked

Answers arrive with their receipts — or refuse to arrive.

Ask for the MSJ deadline and Lex shows the rule-to-fact calculation, cites CCP §437c, and refuses to state a final deadline it can't verify — giving the conditional outer boundary instead. The right-panel workbench holds the document with one-click workflows beside the conversation.

Lex — Hale v. Northstar · governed conversation
Using the selected Matter, determine the last permissible date to file and serve a motion for summary judgment. Verify the necessary Matter dates, show the rule-to-fact analysis, and do not state a final deadline unless every required date and citation is verified.

📄 Result — No single verified combined filing-and-service deadline can be stated, because no reserved MSJ hearing date is present and the filing date has not been independently established.

October 16, 2026 is only the adjusted, trial-date-derived conditional outer boundary.

Governing authority: CCP §437c(a)(2)–(3) · trial date Feb 5, 2027 from 1 verified Matter source · 81-day base notice counted backward · weekend adjustment applied.

🗂 Hale v. Northstar — Alameda📄 Order Denying Motion…

Ask Lex to research, review, draft, or explain… (type / for commands)

📎🎙/ Commands — /matter /task /cite /send /agent🛡 Firm model · governed

02 · Touched

Highlight a passage, and it becomes work.

The workbench renders any DMS document beside the conversation as governed context, exact version pinned. Select any passage and a menu appears: summarize it, ask Lex about it, save it to Matter Intelligence, turn it into a fact note, chronology entry, depo question, issue, or draft — or check it against rule authority and dates.

Right panel workbench — Tentative Ruling · DMS governed context · exact version pinned

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
TENTATIVE RULING

HEARING DATE: 8/14/2026 · JUDICIAL OFFICER: HON. A. OYELARAN
CASE NO.: 26CV004182 · CASE TITLE: Hale v. Northstar Logistics

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.

A. The complaint pleads each element of breach with the specificity Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e) requires; the agreement, the performance rendered, and the July 7 cessation of work are alleged with dates and amounts.

B. The first amended complaint was filed without leave of court. See Code Civ. Proc. § 472(a). The court declines to strike the FAC to avoid further delay, and directs plaintiff to follow all applicable rules going forward.

C. Like attorneys, self-represented litigants must check every citation to ensure that the cited authority exists and supports the proposition for which it is cited.

Tentative Ruling — Hale v. Northstar… Esc

⚡ Ask & use

✨ Summarize💬 Ask Lex📋 Add to prompt⇄ Compare

📌 Save to the Matter

🧠 Matter Intelligence✏️ Note📌 Pin

🗂 Turn into work product

📄 Fact note🕰 Chronology❓ Depo questions⚠️ Issue🗒 Outline✍️ Draft

⚖ Check against authority

⚖ Rule check📅 Dates📊 Benchmark clause

03 · Organized

Projects hold the whole case, honestly.

A Project binds instructions, files, memory policy, and living work products to one matter — a Discovery Matrix that proves it was built from the current record, a preflight that freezes scope and budget before a single token. Context engineering as a feature, not a prayer.

The full Projects story
Project — Civil · Hale v. Northstar Logistics

📁 Civil — Hale v. Northstar

Project chats use the instructions, files, and saved AI work attached here.

Living project work products

📇 Matter Source Inventory CURRENT

Built Aug 14 · 419 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 419 source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🧮 Discovery Matrix FRESH

Built Aug 14 · 19 sources

✓ deterministic build · build receipt recorded

✓ 19 current source fingerprints verified

RebuildOpen

🗺 Matter Evidence Map SCOPE NEEDED

Tests lawyer-defined propositions against the exact current Source Inventory.

Current inventory ready · lawyer proposition required

Define scope

🕰 Case Chronology NOT BUILT

What happened at each stage: filings, responses, hearing outcomes, next expected hearings.

Build nowCustomize

⚠ Issue Register NOT BUILT

Issues, evidence, adverse facts, missing proof, risk, and next action.

Build nowCustomize

+ Describe any work product GOVERNED

Create a governed living Project artifact from a sentence.

🧭 Instructions — “You are my dedicated Civil Law Legal AI Agent for Hale v. Northstar, an Alameda County civil matter, Case No. 26CV004182. Your role is litigation strategy, procedural analysis, hearing preparation…”
📎 Files — 28 files across 15 project sections, mirroring the Matter’s Documents tab · 28 Lex-ready · Pleadings 5 · Discovery 19 · Motions and Briefs 1 · …

04 · Everywhere

One Lex, inside every surface.

The same assistant — with the same evidence rules and the same audit trail — works beside the document in EdgeDocs, answers @Lex mentions in EdgeMessage, sits second chair in EdgeMeet, and takes voice on mobile. Not a chatbot in a separate tab.

One Lex — inside every surface of the practice

EdgeDocs

Lex Document Expert

Briefs the document, proofreads a selection, drafts the next paragraph — edits always stop for review.

EdgeMessage

@Lex in the thread

“@Lex when is our opposition due?” answered in-thread with receipts. DMs can never route to the AI.

EdgeMeet

Second chair, live

Flags a contradiction against the transcript, cited to page:line — attorneys only, accept or dismiss.

EdgeMobile

Voice, governed

“Lex, what’s tomorrow on Hale?” — same evidence rules, same audit trail, in your pocket.

05 · Delegated

Tell it once, and it keeps working.

A sentence becomes a standing delegation with a locked work contract, budgets, and a kill switch — run from the Agent Control Center, every run a real task on the firm's ledger.

The full Delegations story
app.edgelex.com — Agent Control CenterMC

🤖 Agent Control Center

Standing Delegations, committed work, runtime health, and governed delivery.

My DelegationsShared with MeFirm TemplatesFirm DashboardAdministrationAgent Profiles

Matter Watch — Hale v. Northstar ✎

💬 Discuss with Lex📄 Process a document…⏸ Disable✎ New version🗑 Retire

HealthyEnabled

Summarize each newly linked Matter document in exactly 5 bullets.

Definition v3 · 24 linked Tasks · Updated 8/13/2026, 10:24 PM

ACTIVE TASKS

4

IN REVIEW

20

COMPLETED

0

DELIVERY FAILURES

0

06 · Governed

Everything above runs under firm policy.

Which models Lex may use, what each turn may touch, and what every token cost — decided by the firm in the database, enforced before any model call, attributed to the matter.

The full AI Governance story
app.edgelex.com — AI Model GovernanceMC

AI Model Governance

Control which AI models the Lex Runtime can use, set defaults, and monitor usage.

+ Add Provider

🛡 Runtime Governance Active authority

The Lex Runtime checks firm policy in the database before any model call. Browser clients cannot override this policy.

Allowed models25Default modelFirm default · pinnedExternal runtime authorityNo
Providers & ModelsProvider KeysFirm PolicyUsage & AccountingIntent Classifier
AnthropicFrontieractiveRuntime governed2/25 models enabled
OpenAIFrontieractiveRuntime governed11/59 models enabled
xAIFrontieractiveRuntime governed5/5 models enabled
Local GPU — GovernedLocalactiveRuntime governed6/8 models enabled
NVIDIAFrontieractiveRuntime governed0/130 models enabled

The difference

Grounded, or it doesn’t ship.

Every claim in a Lex answer is typed to its evidence — a document span, an email span, a verified citation, a rule authority. A claim with no supporting span is blocked and shown as blocked. Other tools cite; EdgeLex enforces.

How Lex researches →

Typed evidence

Document spans, email spans, verified citations, rule authorities — per claim.

Approval gates

Lex proposes; you approve. Nothing consequential happens on its own.

On the record

Every answer, tool call, and action lands in the matter's audit trail.

Capabilities

What it does

Grounded conversational AI

Multi-turn chat that answers from your matters, documents, emails, and court rules, with streaming responses and cited sources. Answers that can't be grounded are blocked rather than guessed.

Follows the work, not a chat tab

Lex participates where the work lives: as a teammate you can @mention in Messages, a second chair in depositions, a document expert inside EdgeDocs and Word, a triage layer in EdgeMail, and a voice assistant on mobile.

Matter-aware

Scope a conversation to a matter and Lex pulls that matter's documents, tasks, deadlines, notes, and communications into context.

Standing delegations

Beyond conversation, Lex takes standing delegations: plain-language instructions that wake on the firm's events and run inside explicit, whitelisted actions — see Lex Delegations for the full engine.

Approval-gated actions

High-impact actions — send email, save a document, complete a court-mandated task — require explicit human approval. The AI proposes; you approve.

Cross-domain workflows

One request can span the platform: an incoming court order becomes identified events, calculated deadlines, proposed calendar entries and tasks, and a team notification — with the evidence and action history attached to the matter.

Model choice & routing

The firm picks the models — frontier, local open-source, or its own model fine-tuned in the Lex Training Center. An internal router scores models per task and refuses to let underpowered models perform destructive actions.

Governed memory

Lex can remember a user's preferences and facts under a scope-safe contract. Memory is context, never used as legal authority.

In your control

Three-layer model governance (platform / firm / user) with default-deny, full token-and-cost attribution per user, matter, and model, and tool allowlists per agent.

See EdgeLex on your own terms.

We'll walk through self-hosting, model control, and your firm's workflows.